Good news is no news
Shefali Tripathi Mehta, June 7, 2015,
DHNS
The elders’ reprimand to keep quiet if I spoke during the news on radio
is an abiding childhood memory. News was timed — morning and evening on the
radio; the local morning newspaper; and the national newspaper that came in the
afternoon by train in the city I grew up. News was not as easily accessible as
it is now. If one missed it, there was no way of checking it immediately. If
ignorance wasn’t bliss, it was at least less overwhelming. Now it seems there’s
no getting away. We are drowning in information.

Twelve-year old Sana was looking forward to visiting her grandparents in
the summer vacations. When the family decided to do the long journey from
Bangalore to Delhi by train, her first reaction was a worried, ‘What if the
train meets with an accident?’ Train accidents were all she has seen and known
of train journeys from watching news. That was her immediate recall. All around
us there is news of corruption, scams, killings, abductions, rape, poverty,
negligence, injustice. It does not help that news doesn’t ‘come to us’ like it
did about two decades ago, but we ‘go’ to it. In our Internet-enabled,
connected world, we are constantly being bombarded with news and very often
rumour, scandal or expose in the garb of news.
Breaking news — and all of it is breaking — comes streaming to us as it is
unfolding. If it does not update in two seconds on our phones and computers, we
refresh and reboot, panicking about what we may be missing out — a catastrophe
worse than any tragedy we may be following on news. The FOMO or fear of missing
out makes us compulsive news seekers.
In the past few years, I have seen many friends trying to shut out news
completely by not subscribing to newspapers or watching it on television.
Though how one can insulate oneself thus in times when news has a way of
getting to us and not the other way around, is a wonder. How are the readers
and viewers coping? What keeps their hopes for a better world alive?
Choose & filter
Girish Ananth, a software professional, says he would gladly rid himself of the
habit of reading news online and offline that lead to a nagging sense of
despair and depression, but he is addicted. That his job keeps him in front of
an Internet-connected computer at all times makes the escape impossible. But he
has gradually learned to read between the lines and recognise at a glance
whether a news item is sensationalist or agenda-driven or deserving of more
attention.
Tisha Srivastav moderates a closed group called ‘Lifeistan’ on Facebook. In the
group description she states, ‘I will delete pointlessly negative comments’. A
former journalist, Tisha rejects opinionated accounts in favour of field
reportage. She believes that people are cynical because they are passive
receivers of news. People must exercise what she calls the ‘powerful choice of
rejection’ of news. So does Varun Pai, interaction designer, who disregards
stories that do not present the ‘other side’ that allow him to put things into
perspective and form an independent opinion for himself.
Reading news is part of her job as publication and advocacy officer with the
World Health Organization, and Vismita Gupta Smith who was recently in
Kathmandu to report the relief operations says depressing as it is, she cannot
switch off from news because of her need to stay informed. Marzia Ibrahim,
young student and staunch nationalist at heart, wonders how much news is too
much. She supports the freedom of the media to report stories, but feels
strongly about the ethics that they must follow so as to not infringe on the
rights of the people who are part of their stories. Sensationalism and public
shaming needs to stop, something that has spiralled out of control with the
rise of social media, she rues.
Remedy & recourse
We are moved by make-believe; we cry and laugh while
watching films. How is it possible that real life events that give rise to
fear, anger, frustration or anxiety will not affect our moods and consequently
our psychological health? Writer and life coach, Eshwar Sundaresan, says that
negative news impacts those already depressed and he has sometimes advised
depressed clients to avoid watching news or reading newspapers till they feel
better about their own lives.
I asked Sapna G K, a senior counsellor, how
despairing news affects people’s overall perception of life. Her response was
matter-of-fact, “If one cannot control the events that happen in the world, and
if there are more bad things than good, then that is the reality of the
situation, which we need to come to terms with.” She says, “If it bothers you
to the extent that it’s affecting your personal life, you can choose how much
news you want to take in or not at all. Otherwise, do something to make the
world a better place in the ways you can — like volunteering and helping
others.”
Girish too believes that all sorts of unpleasant
things happen over which we have no control, “The world is not a fair place, so
why get involved emotionally? Why not just work on our own ‘circle of
concern’?” He takes recourse in classical music.
Sandeep
Bekal, entrepreneur, is a regular newspaper reader who tries not to get too
perturbed over bad news because he believes there is a lot good happening too
which does not get reported. Spiritualism helps him keep his hope that things
will change for the better. Kahkashan Ahmad, mother of teenagers who works with
an NGO that helps with the education of underprivileged children, comes across
very inspiring stories of the potential and talents of these children, but
regrets that such uplifting news has no takers. Volunteering keeps her hope
alive.
Editor and translator, Keerti Ramachandra, often
shares on Facebook stories of human kindness that she encounters — a passport
officer or a cop who goes out of their way and sometimes beyond their call of
duty to be helpful. She says that generally news makes her angry and frustrated
by its content, but when some act of kindness, some generosity from an
unexpected quarter comes by, she is moved enough to believe in the innate
goodness of human beings and is immediately hopeful.
Immediacy
of sharing
The same items pop up on our newsfeeds again and
again. We share easily on social media. Many-a-times it is not the need to
inform, but a need to show our stand which drives this. In hindsight, a lot of
what we share and say may seem unfair or reactionary. A lot of the sensational
news on social media remains unauthenticated. Displaying poor taste and
discretion, tragedies are laid threadbare for the sake of TRPs because we have
become voyeurs of mourning. This adds to a sense of collective gloom and
hopelessness. Tisha is very clear in her approach to news consumption — to
witness and not react. She says she’s always careful while sharing — never
sharing while witnessing, always later. But such a sagacious mindset is not
easy to sustain on social media which comes with readers’ reactions. Everyone
has a say and it is not always pleasant or thought out. Most responses are not
just lacking in sensitivity, propriety and grace, but are often caustic and
unfair.
Over the last two decades, the line between news
and news features has blurred with news becoming not just emotionalised, but
‘tabloidised’. Our reaction to it is consequently, emotional. Lapses of
judgement are not on the part of the media alone, it is a reflection of the
reactionary mood of society today — our hurry, our frailty of speaking too
soon. These are our failings. We have fed the monster.
Close
to the immediacy of sharing comes what I call the ‘immediacy of caring’, an
irrepressible phenomenon that has burgeoned out of the quick, cheap and easy
means of communication — Internet and mobile phones. My daughter was at school
during the serial bomb blasts of July 2008 in Bangalore. My phone began to ring
within minutes of the news breaking on television and well-wishers from all
parts of the country began to ask if I wasn’t going to fetch her. It wasn’t
closing time yet, so I was sure she would be safe in school. I trusted the
school authorities to ensure the students’ safety and had no reason to worry as
long as she was inside the school with the rest. But pushed thus, I began to
panic. The television news was showing the same clips over and over, there was
fear of the phone lines getting jammed. Many in my situation would have felt
compelled to venture out themselves and create more panic and confusion when
there was absolutely no need.
Exploitive and yellow journalism creates
scaremongering in the most harmless situations. Film Editor Amitabh Shukla says
his father calls him every time it rains in Mumbai. The TV shows everything in
the city submerged, without clarifying that it is in pockets. His family’s
entire perception of Mumbai floods is based not on what he tells them, but what
the TV shows.
A
paradigm shift
Sometime around the 2010s, some people began to
feel strongly about showcasing positive, inspiring stories. These soup for soul
stories quickly caught up the imagination of the readers who were desperate for
stories of courage and motivation as a foil for all the depressing news they
were surrounded with. The reach of digital media provided these new news
websites a comfortable foothold, and gradually, mass following. These social
media-supported news websites like the Better India and Love Hindustan were
able to start an alternative news medium and stick their heads out of the media
clutter by carrying positive stories alone.
‘We feature positive news across India, celebrate
the successes of unsung heroes and change makers, showcase the little known
good things about our country...’ Better India declares. “We believed
despairing news could not make people contribute and change,” says Dhimant
Parekh, founder, the Better India, that started as a two-member team. They
began by linking positive articles from various publications on a blog, but it
was difficult because there were so few positive stories. Then they started
covering feel-good and motivational news themselves and as more people joined
and volunteered, the articles became more varied. Today, the Better India has
more than 1,00,000 followers on Facebook and about 20,000 followers on Twitter.
Love
Hindustan too is a news portal exclusively dedicated to giving readers ‘the
other side of India that everyday newspapers and websites don’t’. They link
positive news articles from other sources and do some stories themselves. The
Logical Indian is another much-followed news website that focuses on bringing
to its readers social issues that according to them ‘often miss the limelight
in the traditional media’. They have a following of over two million. They have
not limited their content to positive news stories alone and prefer to call
their work, ‘efforts for good’.
Striking
a balance
“We need the media to highlight failings of
government bodies, injustices, wrong doings and social problems to create
awareness and get people moving towards positive action and hold the government
agencies accountable,” says Keerti.
This is exactly what Satyen Bordoloi feels. And
there are many like him who are okay with despairing news because it tells them
how and where they can channelise their efforts. An activist and documentary
filmmaker, Satyen does not want to receive only feel-good, uplifting news. If
there is despairing news, it only means he needs to ‘pull up my sleeves to try
and do something about it’. He considers all news positive because once
reported, all misdeeds and malpractices, corruption and scams can only lead to
corrective and positive changes in the society.
Also, news may be upsetting because distressful
news sticks to us more easily and surely than feel-good news, says game
developer Anando Banerjee. If there were two headlines, ‘India jumps up five
places on the Global Happiness Index’ and ‘People die in wall collapse’, we are
likely to read and remember the latter better. There is no doubt there is a
kind of voyeuristic pleasure in others’ misfortunes, but there is also a sense
of relief that ‘it didn’t happen to me’, he adds.
As with
everything else in life, we need a balanced dose of news — with the not-so-good
must come the good. News media should make a consistent effort to report
uplifting news along with the disturbing headlines that cannot be ignored.
Political analyst Prashanth Potluri is of the view that newspapers should
ensure that at least the front page always has positive news so that people
have a good start to their day.
News media gives us what we sanction, it runs on
our choices. We have to stop feeding the monster we have created by rejecting
sensationalism. Mountain-out-of-molehill news would have to stop if we didn’t
consume it. It will seem unthinkable today, but on April 18, 1930, the BBC had
no news for the evening and it announced, “There is no news today.” The
announcement was followed by piano music.